Goshen College pacifists: taking the moral low ground

“Given the choice between peace and righteousness, I choose righteousness.” –Teddy Roosevelt

The Mennonites at Goshen College in Indiana are dead wrong.

This place of higher learning has banned the playing of our National Anthem (substituting it for America the Beautiful) before all sporting events, citing their “pacifist” and “religious” tradition.

This is America, and a college will no longer play the National Anthem. George Washington and Paul Revere are weeping in their graves.

People who hide behind the veil of pacifism have no regard or respect for the freedom we enjoy and cherish in this country. They decry war under any circumstance, no matter how worthy or just. They are the people who say “can’t we all just get along” and opine about world peace while terrorists are abusing women and murdering innocent civilians, even in our homeland.

I am no fan of war. I abhor it and believe it is an awful and appalling way to resolve problems. That does not, however, mean that it is not sometimes necessary and required to restore peace, order, and freedom.  The desire for world peace is admirable, but it is a pipe dream.  Reserved generally for anyone who wishes to watch and do nothing as evil runs rampant through our country and our world.

I would gladly support a “no war” policy, right after the terrorists and tyrants forever stop being terrorists and tyrants.

For the sake of our own blessed nation, as well as the millions of  innocent people all around the world liberated and given a chance at life because of the United States of America, thank God our country is not militarily pacifistic.

As far as the “religious” excuse for clinging to pacifism, this approach clearly ignores thousands of year’s worth of Biblically documented wars used to free and liberate innocent people from the hands of oppressive and enslaving governments.

Renowned Christian scholar C.S. Lewis believed both World War I and World War II were justifiable. He addressed his thoughts on this subject in his most famous work on religious theology, Mere Christianity. He calls pacifism both a theological mistake and a practical one.  Lewis also says pacifism fails on every moral level.

Tell Jews in Nazi Germany or the families of victims of 9/11 you are a pacifist and they would be justified in punching you in the nose (would you punch back?). To adhere to pacifism is to eternally allow the evil in the world prevail.

Pacifists claim war is never justifiable. To them, this means that no matter how bad things get it is morally superior to stay uninvolved. If that’s true, Hitler could have killed 10 million Jews instead of five million.  I wonder if a pacifist would defend his family from an intruder trying to rape his little girls.  Only the worst of naivety would suggest that fighting is never warranted.   Yet, under no circumstance is justified war the correct answer? Please.

It would be nice to dismiss pacifists as well-intentioned, but simply misguided. However, they are not. If they were, they’d fight for the peace they want instead of grandstanding about the evils of war. Yes, war is unpleasant, too bad. As long as there is evil in the world (that is, as long as humankind exists), there will be the need to eradicate it.

When the administration at Goshen College declared it would no longer play the Star Spangled banner, it effectively condemned the very values this country was founded on; to fight and defend freedom, at any and all costs. Someone should tell them that if we toed the pacifist policy line, white Americans would still be enslaving and beating black Americans, Hitler’s Third Reich would never have been brought to demise, and Saddam Hussein would still be torturing and raping as many women as he pleased.

The phrase in the National Anthem that has Goshen College officials up in arms (pun completely, totally intended) is this: “and the rocket’s red glare, the bombs bursting in air.” They say it glorifies war. I say it glorifies freedom, justice, and goodness, all things distinctly American.

I have a difficult time tolerating those who denounce the U.S. military and her history while terrorists fly planes into our buildings.

Consider Colonel Jessup’s speech in A Few Good Men:

“I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way.”

They love and utilize their freedom to say and do as they please, yet attack the method in which that freedom is bestowed upon them.

America, the greatest nation in the history of mankind, is the “land of the free and the home of the brave”. It does not take bravery to shun tribute and eliminate the Star Spangled Banner from your campus, but it does take freedom.

How dare they use the freedom provided them by our fighting men and women to condemn our fighting men and women. This is exactly what they are doing by refusing to honor them with singing the National Anthem.  They are kidding themselves to think it’s doing more good than harm for their students and community.  Remember when we use to raise kids to be country-loving patriots?  This act is disgraceful to our troops, our citizens, our country, and our country’s history.

So, Goshen College, I’ll speak on behalf of the thousands of troops who’ve fought and died and continue to do so for your right to be as unpatriotic and un-American as you please by saying: “You’re welcome”.

You should be ashamed of yourselves.

For more on C.S. Lewis’ take on pacifism and Christianity, read this article: http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=16-03-045-f

About Brady Cremeens
I am a Theology/Communications student in Illinois and using this blog to issue commentaries on culture, politics, and sports, and post other random things I find interesting. I write political commentary at The Right Sphere. I invite you to follow me on Twitter: @brady_cremeens.

14 Responses to Goshen College pacifists: taking the moral low ground

  1. Anonymous says:

    Have you examined the lyrics of all the verses for America the Beautiful? Besides the fact that the tune to The Star Spangled Banner is less sing-able, the sentiments in America the Beautiful are enough to recommend it as the national anthem instead of the Key poem set to a British folk tune/drinking song.

  2. Noebie says:

    i’m not sure that a quote from colonel jessup is the strongest suit :) – also, whatever happened to the 1st amendment?

    • Michael says:

      Any time someone wants to try to justify some appalling act, they hide behind the 1st amendment, Of course they have the right to do this, that was guaranteed by the blood shed to give them that right. In no way does that make it less shameful that they’re doing it. The 1st amendment also confers the right to call them out for their shameful act.

      • Noebie says:

        yes, of course it does

        let me first say that i am a stalwart supporter of our troops – a regular contributor to the uso – i send “care” packages – i give blood – i fly my flag every day in proper weather – and, to me, there is nothing more beautiful than a group of us singing our national anthem, hats off, hands over hearts (especially when followed by the words “play ball”)

        i also do not see a group of people with a pacifist tradition and views choosing to honor our land with a less militaristic (yet no less sincere or beautiful) anthem as a “shameful” act

        this *is* america, after all

    • What about the 1st amendment? I didn’t say they don’t have the right to quit playing the National Anthem. I just said they were wrong for doing so.

  3. Bruce says:

    Brady:
    I really appreciate your willingness to express your convictions concerning this difficult subject, as you provide the documented support for your position. I, too, respect the freedom for those Christ-followers of the pacifist view to take their position and to express it, and would not limit fellowship with them, as related to such.
    I do agree with you, however, that they are dead wrong.

    Bruce

  4. amy tranchitella says:

    Comment to the other comments:

    O beautiful for spacious skies,
    For amber waves of grain,
    For purple mountain majesties
    Above the fruited plain!
    America! America!
    God shed his grace on thee
    And crown thy good with brotherhood
    From sea to shining sea!!

    If reading the words alone don’t give you goosebumps then go to you tube and listen to the Gaither band sing it. And if that doesn’t move you then check your pulse…

    God shed his grace on thee..
    Aunt oddie

  5. nswalters21 says:

    The extremities of the argument are the chains to oppression. Pacifism seems to be an ideal thing on its own, but when evil speaks to the voice of complete cowardice, a.k.a Pacifism, terrible oppresive things occur. One person will have to become the rug without morality and ethics to bring justice. Religion that is pure and undefiled is to care for the widow and orphan in their afflication. The extreme pacifist would duck in the trench and never make any significant impact in bring justice to the world. And it is funny because the “social justice regime” of Christianity almost always makes their appearance on the side of pacifism, but i don’t think they understand that love is not powerless to the inherent problem of evil. The person that asks why evil? does not progress, and is prolly the pacifist Christian. But the person that takes it further and says, yes there is evil, what and how can i do to stop it? This person gets it, and is not the pacifist, nor the crusader. A light in darkness, help to the helpless, hope to the hopeless. We don’t want war, we want justice; peace not hostility; love not hatred, freedom not oppresion; dignity not dehumanization. Loving thy enemy does not mean one cannot act when the enemy is progressing over good. Why would one allow evil to overcome a nation that instills value, dignity, hope, and freedom to people? Few, if any countries, provide and instill such humanistic value in their nation. Pacifism is a extreme liberal agenda that hopes the best, but will always get screwed; it is a system that accepts good and nearly ignores the problem of evil. It asks to many questions; and is always late to answer problems.

    • Tyler says:

      I’m curious about your opinion of loving your enemy. Turning the other cheek is a part of that very sermon, do good to your enemies, and it would be very difficult to twist that into meaning taking up arms against the enemy. You are right one can act but I think the point is not with violence. Jesus is strongly advocating against eye for an eye, yet your point seems to be conflicting with that teaching. The act needs to be doing good, not more harm. The way I interpret this is that if you start showing love to your enemy, that will begin to lessen the tension. Regardless of who started the conflict (both sides generally say it was the enemy), showing love will improve the situation for both sides, and reciprocating with violence never will.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Pacifism is not an agenda, nor is it extreme, nor is it “liberal” as you would like to use political words such as liberal or conservative. What you described in your comment regarding caring for the widow and the orphans, describes the so-called pacifist to a tea. The pacifist will act yes, and they will not sit idly by while watching their child raped (see original article), which is an offensive charge at best. Furthermore, to say that pacifism is an “agenda” that will get “screwed” (your words)….a bit transparent towards the writer is all I will say.
    aunt oddie

  7. amy says:

    didn’t mean to be anonymous: didn’t fill out the name and e-mail part. aunt oddie works though…..

  8. hyck says:

    Hi Brady, follow you on Twitter – great stuff there too, and decided to check out your blog. Great article! I enjoyed reading it, follow your argument and find myself agreeing with your position. I love America the Beautiful and think it is a beautiful patriotic goosebump causing song. I also respect the Mennonite mission of the university. All that being said however, The Star Spangled Banner IS the United States national anthem, the one song associated with the dedication, struggle, and ultimate sacrifice of all those who gave all to create the greatest country the world has ever seen. To me, The Star Spangled Banner, is the anthem that should be performed at all sporting events as both a tradition and reminder to always remember and honor the sacrifice of the greats who went before us. The 1st amendment is, as always, in full effect, but in my opinion, you are right and they are wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 48 other followers

%d bloggers like this: