The case against Occupy
November 2, 2011 50 Comments
Asking “Where did the Occupy movement go wrong?” is akin to musing “Where did Michael Moore’s fitness regime fall apart?” The answer: early, often, all over the place.
The propelling mindset driving the vast majority of the Occupy movement is not one of genuine civil service, dedicated to the honest betterment of America as a whole (like, say, the Tea Party), but rather one of entitled victimization from a growing number of those who think other people should be forced to share their success.
This compilation of old hippies pining for revolution amongst college kids who simply don’t want to make their own way is the unsurprising result of liberalism in America today. This is what happens when children are fed faux lessons in self esteem and tolerance from broken family systems and then taught in school that the theory of communism is noble, if only the implementation could be mastered. American students are engulfed in a sea of liberalism from kindergarten through university, often void of any opposing views and without prompting to study the historical precedent and common sense consequences of the ideology with which they’re being indoctrinated.
The protestors, in the beginning, took to the streets against “corporate corruption and greed.” A decent and reasonable cause to be sure, but one that lasted shorter than a New York minute. Unfortunately, any decent and reasonable people quite quickly picked up their corporation made signs and went home the instant they saw these protests for what they really are: A war against traditional American values, including capitalism, and a battle to get as much of somebody else’s money as possible.
Indeed, any reasonable people left at the first Communist Party endorsement and shivered as their leader said “We are marching side by side and with the occupy movement. They want what we want.” He received a resounding ovation. Any reasonable stragglers willing to give it another try took off when the American NAZI Party backed the cause. With that the anti-American sentiment began piling up.
Spray painting American flags, cries for socialism and income equality, extreme anti-Semitism, signs depicting the decapitation of CEOs, videos wishing for the hanging of George W. Bush. And then, unfathomably, the original Occupy located on Wall Street in New York City created fliers showing how to make paper planes and then threw the planes at buildings.
Anti-American sentiment aside, the list of grievances at these protests expands vastly every day. Thousands of arrests, illegal drugs, dozens of incidents of violence, a growing number of rape and sexual abuse reports (and calls from within the Occupy Wall Street camp not to report the sexual abuse), causing disturbances in area businesses, defecating on the front steps of peoples’ homes, engaging in public nudity and sexual activity, and breaking numerous permit and sanction laws.
“Reasonable” and “occupier” are antonymous.
While the criminal activity and despicable actions are appalling and troublesome, it is the mindset, not the acts, that most frighten me for this country.
It is a lack of common sense that says “Down with evil capitalism!” with no regard for what the alternative really entails. It is a lack of logic that shouts “Corruption must go! Government should take over!”, as if a government takeover would produce less corruption, not eons more. It is an entitlement culture that makes one believe that they have the right to take from someone else what they please.
Occupy Oakland opined recently, “This will take a complete collapse of our current governing system.” And Occupy San Diego marched for citizens’ rights to print their own money. All of this while pushing for government takeover of banks, businesses, the housing market, and loan institutions. Marxism by means of anarchy.
This is America, where people have the freedom to work and make their own success. It is our blessed capitalist system that gave us the strongest economy on the globe, and provides the largest percentage of people the best chance to succeed. It allows for the ebb and flow of free markets to determine what ideas are the best and which aren’t worth the time or money. Capitalism is the fairest system man has created, for it allows every single person an equal opportunity to succeed.
The occupiers want precisely the opposite. They are chanting for government mandated wealth, as if the government is so excellent at doing anything that they should also decide where funds come from and to whom they should be doled out. The occupiers are ignoring thousands of year’s worth of evidence that says as government is expanded and freedom is stifled, everyone suffers. This is socialism, and it grants nothing but equality of failure.
They call for the rich to pay their “fair share”, yet are unwilling to determine just what exactly that number is. The occupiers either choose to ignore, or choose not to care, the fact that if everyone in this country making over $250,000 a year was taxed at 100%, the government could fund the socialistic programs Occupy wants for all of six months. Then what? Who to tax after that?
They complain about Wall Street receiving bailouts, but choose to ignore the real problem: that our government is granting anyone bailouts in the first place. They call for the heads of CEOs while the President they support wasted over 500 million dollars on a “green jobs” scam.
They say, “End the massive amounts of money that control politics.” Yet, when polled, over 70% said they will vote for Obama, who received more Wall Street money than any other Presidential candidate in history. They are hypocrites at every turn. They know not what they want (in any organized, unified manner), nor how to get it, so they turn sharply towards violence and disorder in an effort to prove their relevance.
In a hilariously idiotic display of irony, Occupy Wall Street is experiencing firsthand the failure of the system they are clamoring for. They squabbled over how to properly distribute the over half a million dollars in donations they received. Some people felt they deserved more because they were doing more activist work, versus those who spent their occupying days playing drum circles or doing, well, nothing. What’s incredible is that the same people arguing over how to redistribute the wealth given them are pushing for a complete American system of wealth redistribution. They see no correlation between their own inability to “fairly” distribute money and that government mandated wealth distribution would just as assuredly fail as well, but on a massive, nation-shaking economic scale.
Similarly, the kitchen staff at Occupy Wall Street ran into problems when they felt they shouldn’t have to prepare food for the “homeless and free loaders”. In summary, the group fighting for a socialist nation where everyone is equal regardless of output refuses to serve those who aren’t doing their share. Apparently, hypocrisy and irony are foreign concepts to the Occupy crowd.
What is perhaps most disconcerting is not that a few college kids and hippies are upset about student loans and mortgages, but that this clearly sordid movement has the complete support of major players in the American political system and media. Elizabeth Warren claims to be the “brains behind Occupy Wall Street” (insert joke here); Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and the President himself have all spoken in support of the protests. If that weren’t bad enough, the liberal media has all but drooled over the occupiers and their plight for more than a month now. Keith Olbermann visited the Wall Street squatters, while Rachel Maddow, Anderson Cooper, Chris Matthews, and others have essentially plugged Occupy on a nightly basis. This, of course, is to be expected from those who not only agree with the protestors on most of their pleas, but are working to implement them in an official capacity even as we speak. Anyone who thinks Barack Obama isn’t a socialist hasn’t been paying attention.
It is bothersome that our nation’s leaders sympathize with this cause; it is worse still that they fail to distance themselves when any normal person would watch and be disgusted. What kind of culture do we live in when the President of the United States and his minions, along with thousands of others who may not consider themselves radical, yet certainly support much of this movement (some of my loved ones included) see a group such as this and say “Yes, this is what I support.”
These people got a dog to rip apart an American flag amongst a cheering crowd, drew a Swastika on Martin Luther King Junior’s statue, have “solidarity” marches with NAZIs and pedophiles, and hung an effigy of a banker with a noose. Who doesn’t step back and think, “Wait a minute, what am I hitching my wagon to?”
Normal people do not include themselves amongst NAZIs, communists, rapists, and thugs. Normal people run the other direction.
If you woke up from a 6-month coma and saw these two sides - one with the support of American tradition, family values, and good, smart people like Thomas Sowell and the other with the support of NAZIs, Jew-haters, beastiality advocates, and the current President of the United States – which would you gravitate towards?
It is not these protests that must be squelched, although I suspect that will happen eventually, the first time somebody gets shot (it’s coming), but rather the mindset that I deserve the benefits of another person’s success. That idea is dangerous to the very fabric of American freedom, and will forever cripple American prosperity (and consequentially the world’s economy will suffer) if not stomped out with every boot and ballot. The idea that success should be a mandated right is distinctly anti-American, as is Occupy.
I want an America where hard work and success is celebrated, not shunned. An America where people want to make something of their lives because contributing to society is inherently good. An America more like Reagan’s America, where Communism is a dirty word, not prayed for in the streets of our cities.
Author’s note: If you aren’t sure what to think about the Occupy movement, or want proof of the events taking place, I’ve got dozens of videos and articles documenting the protests. Just ask.
Many in the Occupy movement, many, are against government taking over anything. Cremeens, I respectfully disagree with much of this post and suggest you’ve missed who and what Occupy is about. The roots of which can be traced to the Arab Spring. Not to mention of course, Wall Street.
Oh shut it with the Arab Spring. You only make yourself look more ignorant and emphasize the authors point. Have you even been paying attention to what has been occurring post Arab Spring. Egypt is leaderless and still controlled by the military. The Muslim Brotherhood is circling the wagons and building power. Coptic Christians are being killed solely on the basis of their religion. If you want an Arab Spring, I recommend you go to Egypt and enjoy the ‘fruits’ of their revolution. Useful idiots.
well said Matt
The Arab Spring resulted in moderate leaders being replaced with the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslims Brotherhood is an extremist Islamic group that wants Shariah Law instituted all over the world. So, Mickey, why don’t you tell us what the “Occupy” movement is all about? People go into business to get rich and make a profit, so why are you upset that they succeed? You could do the same yourself if the government would get out of the way and not make so many regulations that the average guy can’t afford to go into business for himself. You have the wrong target and the wrong enemy.
We all keep arguing the wrong points. This entire debate is simply a distraction from the issues that underly the whole problem.
1.) We have roughly $16 trillion in total money supply against a realistic economic value of about $5 trillion
2.) We have alloed the creation of a professional political class that is not check and balanced by the industry or law only motivated by gifts for votes.
3.) We have alloed the modification of our economic system such that it is federal subsudies, fueled by the indiscriminant creation of false money that has lulled us for 40 years into believing we sere succeeding economically.
We cost to much, we work too little, we are vastly overeducated, and we have no labor pool. In this one world economy we are now significantly crippled competitivly. We choose to vilify those who do not share our human values – the whole time we are doing this they have simply lour manufactured us, out competed us and allowed us to drive ourselves to the edge of the cliff.
If we keep up this debate, this frameless argument and misdirected dialog we will be whining all the way to the lemming burial ground.
http://www.loker.com or http://tloker.wordpress.com
Yes I agree Mickey, the movement is about bowel movements on police cars, rape, drugs, Communism, rioting, assualts on the police. The author does not spend enough time on that stuff!!
HOw like a liberal to “disagree” with a well written and thought out piece without providing a single fact to base the disagreemont upon. Get back to work on Obama 2012, clueless.
The Arab Spring Provided a much better ride for the Arab Truck ;0))
Very well thoughtout article. We share much of the same information and conclusions. Most importantly, I think the OWS people like much of the rest of America, really do not know what it is they are upset about. That takes effort, something they so far dont seem interested to do.
Nice, job Brady. I enjoyed reading!
Mickey Garrote: First let me commend you on the respectful tone of your post. It’s refreshing and unexpected. Unfortunately, this large group of well-intentioned and rational people that you insist exist somewhere at “occupy” is hard to find, and is not being allowed to participate in crafting the official message. And the NAZI’s and communists ARE there and supportive of the movement.
Brady has characterized everyone from “occupy” that I have heard (at least the few who can form a coherent sentence) perfectly.
And, yet, libs keep insisting that if we only “understood” we would support the movement as well.
Rock On Brady, You nailed it! I only Wish more 20 somethings were as wise as you!
I agree with Anonymous!!!!! We need more young people to become informed about what is going on in our country and articulate it to others! Keep up the great work, Brady!!!!! You are on your way! You are running a great race!
“Socialism only works in two places:
Heaven where they don’t
need it and hell where they already have it.”
-Ronald Reagan
It’s amazing the ability of some people – the author of this blog and several responders to it included – to delude yourselves and each other so thoroughly and intentionally. I am so curious as to why? Depicting an entire movement of hundreds of thousands of people all over the country and around the world as not being able to form a sentence? Get serious.I have been to two occupy locations and friends who have been to several others. Our experiences are all the same – a wide range of people with a wide range of views and ways of expressing them. That’s America, get used to it! And if you don’t like it, go away, or stay at home and watch your collection of videos documenting how the entire movement – backed by countless professionals, teachers, politicians, parents, hippies, homeless, students and cops – are really just lazy whiners who want a free ride. Get out, go to your nearest occupation – with an open mind if you can – and actually talk to a few folks. There are plenty of people out there who are happy to engage you in respectful dialogue. Then you might learn something and have something of value to offer your readers rather than resorting to mindless cliches and drivel. Plus you’ll be on the right side of history when the dust settles because the people always win when fighting for basic civil and constitutional rights, and, believe it or not, THAT is what this is all about.
Peace.
Hundreds of thousands ? Please. A couple thousand ? Maybe
The idea that OWS is some kind of “massive” movement is pure fiction presented to you by the liberal media. It is NOT massive and of the few people that ARE involved, half of them are nothing but semi-pro agitators for anarchy.
They do not represent anything close to “the 99%”. Politically speaking, they self-identify as closer to “the 1%”. A recent Fordham poll found 39% of them are EXTREMELY liberal, more than even those just identifying themselves as just “liberal” – 33% – with another 8% calling themselves “slightly liberal”. 80% liberal. And then, only 5% conservative. In a nation where 40% call themselves conservative, OWS hardly represents “the 99%”.
And the really ironic thing is, most of those that failed to say “extremely” liberal probalby think communism is some kind of “moderate” position.
Who am I going to believe here Uncle Sam? You or the author and my own lying eyes?
“…an entire movement of hundreds of thousands of people…”
“…the entire movement – backed by countless professionals, teachers, politicians, parents, hippies, homeless, students and cops…”
“…you’ll be on the right side of history when the dust settles because the people always win when fighting for basic civil and constitutional rights…”
It sounds like you are describing the Tea Party here instead of dishonestly trying to pass your “observations” off as an accurate picture of a SMALL slacker movement supported by Communists and Nazis.
Free college tuition is not a right. Loan forgiveness is not a right. Entitlement is not a right. Our rights in the US come from God, not the government. It’s not America. It is lazy, uninformed children who have been victimized by academia. It is rent-seeking political groups. It is a result of the “everyone gets a trophy” philosophy. These are not the ideals upon which our great nation was founded. All of that aside, when is vandalism, violence and rape the vehicle for effecting change?
Sweetie, when the dust settles, OWS will be a distant memory and the punch line to a lot of dated jokes. And, just curious, of what civil and constitutional rights are you folks currently being deprived?
“Then you might learn something and have something of value to offer your readers rather than resorting to mindless cliches and drivel.”
Read Thomas Sowell. Preferably start out with “Conflict of Visions.” Then you might learn something and have something of value to offer.
Yeah, like really man!! Right on, power to the people: war never solved anything, except, well Facism, Communisim, slavery, imperialism, beside that nothing.
OK, I was kidding. You want to see America as it really is? Go to a firebase in Afganistan and talk to 20 year olds American kid from Iowa is is defending freedom; the self entitled morons occupying wall street that you describe are nothing but entitled punks with a bad, but costly education who know less than nothing about the real world. Ah, that felt good!!
I have three disparet obeservations about the Occupy movementat this point.
1.) Perhaps this is Obama’s plan to grow jobs. Foment revolution to destroy our cities and infrastructure then rebuilt it creating jobs???
2.) The more I heal adn see what the occupt people are doing it is all “Greek” to mje!
3.) The people in Oakland must be at leaset slightly askew. The name of the protest is Occupy Wall Street, yet the west coast version of wall street is 8 miles away in San Francisco. So Why occupy Oakland? There is nothing really banking or wall street related there. It is close to Bezerkely though!
I would love to stop and talk with some of these folks waving their signs that say hurray for our signs, but I am on my way to work.
I agree that a vast majority of people have dropped that ball when it comes to politics. Myself included. But I don’t think the design was ment to allow money to dictate our our direction. It is a very complex monster at this point. And it is obvious to even me, that the direction we are going is far from what the majority would choose. Maybe when the unemployment rate gets closer to 50% we will start hearing from the highly educated. You seem like a smart guy, how is the obvious corruption, bribery, intentional loop holes, mindless elephant Vs donkey puppetshow, private money press(fed res), disregard for environment and compromisation of the Constitution of the United States of America not a little frustrating for you. I guess what I am saying is, maybe the uneducated could use your help. Just play it out in your mind, something has got to give. The protest isn’t against hard work, it’s against the reward system that has been created. Good guy finishes last. America is where people ran to in order to escape this same type of system(money rules all). Anyway I am going back to see my lazy friends who just like to camp in the middle of the city for no particular reason. Peace
You should read the article available here: http://wp.me/p1EoHE-bF. The issues people are focusing on are, for the most part, root caused by a very few fundamental probelms. As such, we are focusing our anger and animosity in the wrong areas. We are blaming certain people that are neither the cause nor the cure for the issues at hand. And there is some evidence to suggest that this diversion and distraction is both purposful and planned specifically for this effect. If true, it is likely the controllers are not planning to foment revolution just chaos, but control of anarchy is iffy. We are all feeling real risk here.
Our problems lie in the fundamentals of how the economy works, more importantly the system of banking that we have (not necessarily the banks themselves) Also, they lie in what we have allowed our political process to become. THe politicians we have today are a far cry, one could say polar opposit from the type of politicians envisioned at the start of America. Finally, we live with a series of fundamental myths about our country and our history.
I think some of your comments are on point, but I think like any1one, your view is biased and you choose extremes to make your arguement. But your thesis that the movement has lost its true goal and oringinal purpose is probably right on.
What I would challenge you to think about is the role of social privilege and how access to wealth is created and maintained. The fact that so little of our nation’s wealth is handled by so few people is dangerous. And just like socialist societies no society has survived being so top heavy.
Part two of my challenge is that you rally around through your words here and tweets about hypocrisy. Beware of your own. You complain about assaults and crimes committed at Occupy Wall Street and then advocate that people burning flags should be punched in the face at these events. Now, I certainly believe that burning the American flag should not be taken likely, but a violent response is not an answer. Beware of your own hypocrisy if you are going to be so quick to point it out in others.
Also, let us not pretend that there are not scary radicals in the Tea Party that have lost the true meaning of that movement.
Well written, and points well made , Brady. I repect your values, and giftedness as a writer — can’t wait to see where you’re headed, as you continue to develop.
Blessings, Bruce
“You complain about assaults and crimes committed at Occupy Wall Street and then advocate that people burning flags should be punched in the face at these events.”
I think that you came to the wrong place if you are looking for consistency.
Wow, this is a spot-on analysis of this manufactured movement. These organizers and protesters are basically anti-American and painfully ignorant of how the real world actually works. Unfortunately, there are a great many who don’t keep up with politics and don’t understand that bad governmental policies have contributed to our current economic downturn.
This is basically a giantic display of ignorance and brainwashing. Anyone who would appear at one of these events to protest is only embarassing themself.
Great post! Amazing how it has taken the MSM over six weeks to finally start to realize what most of us who were paying attention – and doing the BASIC research to find out who and what are behind this “movement” – knew within a couple of days of hearing about it.
Then again, it’s been over 3 years, and they STILL aren’t asking questions about Dear Leader’s background and/or motives…..
We have some serious problems and OWS isn’t helpful.
1) We have created an entitlement system that is unsustainable. When there was enough money for everyone, no one whined, but now the bill is due, and no one wants to give up their gov’t promised goodies. We’ve known that SS# & Medicare were going to fall apart for 30 years. The “Third Rail of Politics” quote is older than that. Those that are my parents generation did nothing to solve it, want the young to pay for it, knowing full well they will receive no benefits, but instead be left with crippling debt.
Our politicians raided the “lock box” 30 years ago and left an IOU.
2) Our education system is more interested in indoctrination than true education. When budget cuts come, it’s the newest teachers who get the axe, and NEVER ever the diversity programs.
3) Out political class have created a generation of those that feel entitled and now they can’t pay. The classic response: blame someone else. Like the banks they FORCED to make bad loans.
Hey, I dont have a pretty girlfriend like yours, so you have to share her with me or I will “occupy protest” in front of your house.
It’s refreshing to see a young person without the sense of entitlement that is so common in youth today. (And, apparently, in some of the adults occupying Wall Street.) My one regret as a youth coach was buying into the “everyone gets a trophy” philosophy. We were creating monsters and thought we were just sparing someone’s feelings. If you didn’t do the work, you didn’t EARN anything!! It does not belong to you!!
Pingback: OWS in a nutshell | Questions and Observations
In my view the key error of the OWS kids (and I mean the naïve, vaguely angry young people, not the professional activists and anarchists, who deserve vastly more contempt) is a failure to make basic distinctions: what they should be protesting is the current role of the financial sector within the capitalist framework, not capitalism itself.
Even to a level-headed, non-protesty guy like me, the financial sector, and the overall structure of modern finance, have a great deal to answer for. This isn’t categorically true for “capitalism” as a whole, which at its base is really just the notion that price signals create and distribute value much more efficiently than other systems. (And that people who create value should get to keep it.) The finance sector has however become largely a species of advanced rent-seeking, and due to its enormous scale and over-valued position within the economy, it has inflicted types of damage which could have been avoided in the past, and ought to be avoided in the future.
I doubt that even a loopy OWS kid, if he really thought about it, would get angry over the thought of a “capitalist” getting rich by making and selling candy bars, or cell phones, or Victoria’s Secret lingerie. The proper function of the finance sector after all is to raise money so that companies can make and do these things, which benefit everybody.
But the finance sector has gone into the business of gaming the system for inside gain, which doesn’t create additional value, it merely steers more of it to the financiers — and these days, on a scale that warps and distorts the giant US economy. It takes a lot of effort to distort something that big. And that is worth getting angry about.
If these kids had thought this through they could have accomplished something. But instead they look like callow dupes of Marxist nitwits. They have, as they say, buried the lede, and I’m sure the financiers are thrilled that they’ve made such a huge strategic blunder. As always, know your enemy.
I appreciate the comments, everybody. Thank you for reading! Keep up the discussion, I enjoy hearing other people’s points of view.
Pingback: Ideas have consequences | Tempe Tea Party
B.C. says at 11:25 a.m.: “Keep up the discussion, I enjoy hearing other people’s points of view.”
Well then, in the interest of ‘furthering discussion’ as it were… what is your opinion of what I said in the immediately previous comment at 10:30 a.m.? Do you agree with that analysis, or do you have a different take?
Not to be overly fussy, but in the end these matters can’t (or shouldn’t) be about the mere enjoyment of discussing them (although I won’t deny that a good argument is plain old enjoyable!); the conversation really ought to be about trying to arrive at a more true/accurate/useful (these things are in many ways the same) view of a very complicated and kooky scenario.
So… whaddaya think, B.?
I think your take was mostly right-on. I believe I am a little less gracious than you are when it comes to the protestors and their purpose. You seem to suggest that the majority have good intentions that are being corrupted by those who do not, while I believe that the vast majority do not have good intentions. Your first paragraph was perfectly correct and excellent. In fact, I wish I would have written that myself! I agree that there is anger to be had (I have plenty) but without correct focus, it is destrucful and dangerous, as we are currently witnessing. The Tea Party took their anger and turned it into a peaceful, constructive, and organized movement to elect officials who would advocate for the ideals in which they believe. These occupiers, well, I’ve already talked about what they do in the post.
Again, thank you for reading and commenting, it is very much appreciated. I enjoy rational and reasonable discussion.
I teach at one of the most liberal institutions… SFSU where trying to teach any conservative view points is like walking on hot coals.However, I do so anyway (if not all anyone gets these days from academia is a liberal slant. It is refreshing to have read an article this well thought out and that gives examples with what ifs. I will be really happy to pass this along to my students who are studying social movements from the original Tea Party to the current Tea party and everything else in-between. Best to you and keep up the writings!
Thank you! I hope your students get something of value from the piece. Let me know how it goes!
I wish you mattered enough to say more about, and that the “professor” who lauded you knew how to close her parenthetical comment.
Great Column. But OWS just needs to get organized. Get everybody in the same color shirts so they can tell their supporters from the 1%. Brown is nice; doesn’t show dirt or blood stains. Seriously, I hope those OWS children aren’t economics majors. Since Occupy Wall Street wants to forgive all debts, (wiping out savings and checking accounts in banks), if it looks like they will win, I’m going to max out my credit card. On ammo. OWS is the failure of American Education made manifest. If all of OWS’s demands were met, 50% to 80% of the American population would die of hunger, exposure or violence in the next five years. Occupy rapes have already been reported, can murders be far behind? I think this is the start of the entitlement riots I’ve been predicting for some time, because government cannot possible redeem its trillions of dollars in pledges, as both parties bought votes for the past 30 years with borrowed money. We are facing a fiscal collapse, followed by a social and political collapse. I will link to this from my Old Jarhead blog.
Robert A. Hall
Author: The Coming Collapse of the American Republic
(All royalties go to a charity to help wounded veterans)
For a free PDF of my book, write tartanmarine(at)gmail.com
Pingback: It’s time for Occupy Wall Street to get disbanded | One Fine Jay
Blake said you were a pretty good writer, I agree. The Occupy fiasco makes this old farmer wonder what the real motives are behind this. Enjoyed the commentary!
Blake’s Dad
Thank you, sir. I appreciate that!
Wow, you beat the hell out of that straw man. Set him up and knocked him straight the fuck down. I’m hiding my scarecrow.
Anyone can (and already has) put words into the mouth of Occupy and ripped apart their imaginary picture of what the movement is. It’s a lot easier to invent the perfect punching bag than to address people whose ideologies range from Ron Paul right-wingery to Democrats to socialists to anarchists.
Imagining a single monolithic enemy makes you look really immature. Quoting a single person to represent that entity makes you look foolish. And imagining quotes where none are available makes you look outright dishonest.
P.S.: Since you don’t quite get what Nazis are about, they support the anti-capitalist bent of Occupy because fascism is anti-modernist and ultra-nationalist. Capitalism is global and ever-changing, and a movement built on ultranationalism and traditionalism opposes that.
Left-wingers oppose capitalism usually because it’s unfair, unstable, ecologically suicidal, etc.
So they agree in their disdain for capitalism but for different reasons. Much like how you agree with the Nazis on the importance of tradition.
The difference is that I’m not going to imply that because you agree with Nazis on a single thing that somehow puts you in league with them. Most conservatives claim to be in favor of less government. Does that put them in league with anarchists?
Just because you usually write to an echo chamber of people who will nod along uncritically doesn’t mean you ought to be so intellectually dishonest. You can string together sentences reasonably well. The next step is learning how to formulate a rhetorically sound argument before you begin writing.
Impressive, Brady! No matter what others say and with everyone’s personal opinions aside, you clearly presented a well-thought out argument with sufficient proofs to go along with your solid reasoning in this blog. Keep up the intelligent work!
can you actually email me links to the videos and news sources that you have pulled from? I have a keen interest in this subject and am writing my final paper about the “entitlement” movement. Again, any credible sources would be very helpful to me.
I’d be glad to. I want to keep my email address (and yours) private, though. Do you have twitter? If so, @ reply me and I’ll follow you back, then we can exchange emails via DM.
VERY GOOD POST BUT ACCEPT ALL PEOPLE ESPECALLY MUSLIM IN THIS COUNTRY FASTEST GROWING MOVEMENT WORLD WIDE AND THEY ARE DISCRIMATED IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!